This article explores the role of motivational interviewing in the practice of psychological services within penitentiary institutions and examines the specific features of its application in work with incarcerated individuals. The method was developed within the framework of the third wave of the cognitive-behavioral approach.
The relevance of the study is determined by the need to implement effective psychological methods aimed at enhancing inmates’ internal motivation for personal change, reducing destructive patterns of behavior, and fostering responsibility for personal life decisions under conditions of deprivation of liberty.
The purpose of the study is to provide a theoretical analysis and substantiate the potential use of motivational interviewing as a method of psychological support and intervention for individuals serving custodial sentences, as well as to identify its practical value within the activities of penitentiary psychological services.
The article outlines the main goals, objectives, core skills, and counseling styles associated with motivational interviewing. Particular attention is given to the methodology of conducting motivational interviews with inmates, taking into account the specific characteristics of the penitentiary environment, elevated levels of psychological defense, distrust toward mental health professionals, and limited readiness for change. The paper also examines tools, techniques, and methods aimed at modifying cognitive and behavioral patterns and promoting a responsible, self-directed approach among incarcerated individuals.
The findings indicate that the application of motivational interviewing in penitentiary psychological practice contributes to increased self-awareness among inmates regarding their behavior, the development of intrinsic motivation for positive change, a reduction in resistance to psychological intervention, and the strengthening of the therapeutic alliance. The use of this method enhances the effectiveness of preventing recidivist and destructive behavior and improves inmates’ emotional well-being and adaptive capacities.
The practical significance of the study lies in the applicability of the presented theoretical framework and methodological recommendations to the work of psychological services in penitentiary institutions. The materials may be utilized in the professional practice of psychologists, as well as in training and continuing education programs for specialists in the field of penitentiary psychology.

